workingfortheman.com


The Annual Survey

by Laina F.

Every year, every single one of us at Big Corporation is required to take the annual survey. The survey is a list of 70 statements to which we must choose a response: Agree Strongly, Agree Somewhat, Disagree Somewhat, Disagree Strongly, or Not Applicable/Don't Know. The statements cover various aspects of the company at several levels.

Some of the statements appear every year:

  • I have the information I need to do my job.
  • My coworkers do a good job of communicating the information I need to do my job.
  • My manager does a good job of communicating the information I need to do my job.
  • My manager's manager does a good job of communicating the information I need to do my job.

    Some of the statements vary from year to year. For example, this year we have:

  • I understand the concepts of the Furkley Initiative.
  • My coworkers understand the concepts of the Furkley Initiative.
  • My manager understands the concepts of the Furkley Initiative.
  • My manager's manager understands the concepts of the Furkley Initiative.

    Ah yes, the Furkley Initiative. I have received brochures in the mail explaining the Furkley Initiative and its importance to the future of Big Corporation. I have watched a video explaining the Furkley Initiative and its importance to the future of Big Corporation. I have viewed a 4-part online presentation explaining the Furkley Initiative and its importance to the future of Big Corporation. I have certified that I have read/viewed each of these, and my certifications have gone into my permanent employee record.

    Big Corporation paid Big Consulting Firm a truckload of money to come in and tell us that we could do things faster and more efficiently if we would only restructure our procedures in compliance with the Furkley Initiative. This seems to involve a whole lot of committees with cool names (one of my favorites is the XFunc.Bus.Alignment committee). Some committee somewhere is responsible for identifying and tracking all phases (also with cool names) of all projects. It is extremely important that we all recognize that the Furkley Initiative is a cross-functional endeavor.

    Unfortunately, I'm sure, the Furkley Initiative has so far had very little effect on my job. Well, okay, it's actually had none, but that's probably because my job involves doing productive work.

    But back to the annual survey.....

    Once every single one of us at Big Corporation has completed the survey, the results are tabulated, and each department holds a meeting that lasts until the department produces an Action Item for every survey statement that did not get a positive response average (Agree Somewhat or Agree Strongly).

    My department provides 24x7 technical support, and this meeting is the only time that we are all in the same place at the same time, and it is the only time ever that our phone goes unanswered. The meeting is usually held at a restaurant of our manager's choice, and, unbelievably, we are expected to pay for our own meal. We are not allowed to consume alcohol. After eating, we begin the process of coming up with an Action Item for every statement that our group did not answer positively. Note that there is no real neutral choice among the possible responses. There is "Not Applicable/Don't Know", but it counts as a non-positive response. If everyone in the group responds "Not Applicable/Don't Know" to a statement (such as "I would sell my children to ensure success of the Furkley Initiative"), we have to come up with an Action Item for that statement. Bitterly sarcastic Action Items are not acceptable to management.

    So say that my group has a non-positive response average to the statement "My manager does a good job of communicating the information I need to do my job". The group might come up with the Action Item: "My manager will hold quarterly group meetings." My manager writes down the Action Item and signifies that he approves it; eventually it gets passed along to his manager, his manager's manager, etc. It will not be the case that my manager actually holds quarterly group meetings. In the nine years I have been with Big Corporation, there has yet to be an Action Item that was acted upon.

    Which brings us to the survey's inevitable 70th and final statement: "Last year's action items were addressed."

    Well, they weren't, and they never have been. But if the group fails to give a positive response to this statement, we have to come up with an Action Item. "The company will address Action Items" is not an Action Item acceptable to management. My coworkers are bright people, and we all realized quite quickly that the only reasonable way to deal with this statement is for all of us to "Agree Strongly". If there were an "Agree Rabidly and Hope to Die if We Don't" response, we would be thrilled to choose it, as long as we didn't have to produce an Action Item.

    In fact, we've learned that the most painless thing to do is to "Agree Strongly" to all the statements in the survey; the meeting ends far sooner, a lot of paper is saved, and my manager is in a good mood for a couple of days.

    Incidentally, the survey is supposed to be anonymous, but try being the one who doesn't complete it by the deadline and see what happens.

    Despite her never-ending whining, Laina will be quite happy to continue working for the man at Big Corporation until she retires. Laina Strongly Agrees with the Furkley Initiative.

    Back to the archives.

    Return to the main page.



  • © copyright 1997-2004 Jeffrey Yamaguchi